Current review
Forecast assumption monitoring Continuously flag external or operating signals that could invalidate material planning assumptions.
Use case Forecast assumption monitoring Variance narrative drafting Scenario design assistant Close anomaly triage Reconciliation support Accounting policy research companion Cash forecast signal enhancement Daily liquidity briefing Collections prioritization Working-capital action synthesis Management-pack orchestration Continuous control monitoring 0 of 10 applicable controls tested
Control work required 10 not addressed0 defined0 tested
Selections are saved only in this browser so you can return to the review. They are not submitted.
01
Data boundary Are permitted data sources, classifications, and prohibited inputs explicitly documented?
Evidence to inspect Approved source inventory, classification decision, and masking or minimization rules.
Risk if missing Sensitive or unreliable data enters the workflow without visibility. Status Not addressed Defined Tested Not applicable 02
Model and provider Is the model, provider, hosting path, and retention behavior approved for this use?
Evidence to inspect Provider assessment, approved configuration, contractual terms, and named technical owner.
Risk if missing Finance information is processed in an unapproved environment or retained unexpectedly. Status Not addressed Defined Tested Not applicable 03
Source traceability Can a reviewer trace material outputs back to the exact source data and assumptions?
Evidence to inspect Citations, input snapshot, prompt or workflow version, and calculation lineage.
Risk if missing Unsupported output enters a management, accounting, or operational decision. Status Not addressed Defined Tested Not applicable 04
Financial integrity Are generated figures and material statements reconciled to governed finance records?
Evidence to inspect Reconciliation procedure, tolerance thresholds, exception log, and reviewer sign-off.
Risk if missing Generated output conflicts with the ledger, approved plan, or system of record. Status Not addressed Defined Tested Not applicable 05
Human authority Is a qualified person accountable for review, approval, override, and escalation?
Evidence to inspect RACI, approval point, override procedure, and training record.
Risk if missing Automation makes or influences a material decision without accountable judgment. Status Not addressed Defined Tested Not applicable 06
Access and records Are access, retention, change history, and review evidence controlled and auditable?
Evidence to inspect Role-based access, activity logs, retention schedule, and version history.
Risk if missing Unauthorized use or an incomplete audit trail weakens accountability. Status Not addressed Defined Tested Not applicable 07
Performance monitoring Are quality, false negatives, exceptions, drift, and reviewer corrections monitored?
Evidence to inspect Baseline, test set, operating thresholds, recurring review, and named metric owner.
Risk if missing Performance degrades silently after the pilot or misses material exceptions. Status Not addressed Defined Tested Not applicable 08
Resilience Can the finance process continue safely when the AI service or workflow fails?
Evidence to inspect Manual fallback, recovery procedure, service dependency map, and continuity test.
Risk if missing A provider or workflow failure interrupts a critical finance process. Status Not addressed Defined Tested Not applicable 09
Incident response Are incorrect output, data exposure, control failure, and vendor incidents routed clearly?
Evidence to inspect Severity definitions, escalation contacts, containment steps, and correction procedure.
Risk if missing A material issue persists because ownership and response expectations are unclear. Status Not addressed Defined Tested Not applicable 10
Value and exit gate Are benefit evidence, operating cost, scale criteria, and stop conditions agreed in advance?
Evidence to inspect Baseline, benefit owner, total-cost view, day-90 decision record, and exit criteria.
Risk if missing The pilot scales on enthusiasm rather than controlled, measurable value. Status Not addressed Defined Tested Not applicable This review is a structured planning aid, not a certification, audit opinion, benchmark, or substitute for accounting, legal, privacy, security, technology, internal-audit, or model-risk review.